Search QAs

Regards the changes to template (S.30.03) in 2.8 taxonomy, and the associate LOG guidance (in the draft business package supporting SII taxonomy 2.8.0). We would like to confirm the implication of the LOG guidance sentence for C0245: ""In case the treaty only includes one layer, this cell will be equal to C0250."" 1. We assume the reference to C0250 is a typo (C0250 is the Number of reinstatements), we believe C0240 was intended instead. Please confirm 2.

Concerning taxonomy 2.9.0, new field in List of assets (PF.06.02/ PFE.06.02), C0241 Bail-in rules: Should the code BAIL_IN_BOND_DESIGNATION from Bloomberg be used for this reporting (for bonds), or should the information be retrieved from elsewhere? How can we find out which shares are subject to bail-in rules, is it all shares issued by banks?

Relating to taxonomy 2.8, can you provide some guidance please on new fields in S.30.03 fields C0420 - C0440. Specifically 'commissions as percentage'. Please confirm what the percentage is relative to? For example a fixed commission amount is a percentage of what exactly? Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.

In cell R1210 (Balance - other technical expenses/income), should we input net other income minus net other expenses? Please tell me if R1300 (Total expenses) equals the net technical expenses from local GAAP.

Are companies operating in the power generation business eligible for Qualifying Infrastructure Corporate Investments?

For example, would a company primarily producing electricity through non-renewable sources be eligible?

I have consulted the final version of the second batch of technical standards for DORA. I'm able to match mandate articles in each case, except for article 30.5. This one used to point to "JC 2023 67 - CP on draft RTS subcontracting" but I can't see a final version of this document in the release of July 17, nor any related info: https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/publications/second-batch-policy-products-u… Is its release postponed (for when in that case)? Or is it accepted as-is, without modification?

Could you please provide examples or specifications on authenticity concepts/methods under DORA?

Does the reference in Art. 30 para. 3 (c) DORA on “the provision of services by the financial entity in line with its regulatory framework” relate to the services the financial entity provides to its customers (e.g. the policy holders in case of an insurance undertaking)?

How is Art. 30 para. 3 (e) (iv) DORA to be interpreted?