Skip to main content
Logo
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
 

Search QAs

Filter by

Search QAs ()

RSS
Showing results 320 to 330

In the new ITS 2023/894, Annex III, instructions for S.36.01, you have: NC0190 Amount of dividends/interest/coupon and other payments made during reporting period This cell shall capture any payments made in relation to the intragroup transaction s recorded in this template for the reporting period (6 months up to the reporting date)articl

Is a credit default swap considered a financial instrument

I understand that funds with no look-through are treated as type 2 equity when calculating their capital charges.

Regarding the "Identification code of the ICT third-party service provider’s ultimate parent undertaking" and the "Type of code to identify the ICT third-party service provider’s ultimate parent undertaking". I am having doubts regarding the concept of ultimate parent undertaking. My question is if, for the purpose of DORA,

An Insurance client has filed to discontinue operations in Europe and have stopped any new business. Their European exit is mid 2025. Would they need to comply with all parts of DORA or are there exemptions? Could they apply for an extension?

Is there a presumed timeline of the reissue of ITS regarding the standard template for the register of information referred to in article 28(3) DORA by the ESAs? Furthermore, is there a presumed timeline of adoption of the RTS on subcontracting ICT services supporting a critical or important function (legal basis being article 30(5) DORA)?

EV63_3 and EV63_4 seem to be improperly implemented. The rule EV92 states that the Investment Expenses should be equal or lower to the investment expenses reported in S.29.02 (C0010 / R0050). The investment expenses in S.29.02 are reported negative too comply with the calculations in force on the S.29 in general.

A Group contains within it both insurance entities and banking entities; for the purposes of preparing the Register at a consolidated level, must it consider both types of Entity? To which Authority is the Register sent at a consolidated level?

We have a supplier who handles a critical process for us. Although the service itself is not directly ICT-related, the supplier uses ICT systems to deliver these services to us. The supplier believes that they should not be classified as a third party under DORA and therefore do not need an additional agreement. When I make an overall assessment of this

Are Payroll service providers or Payroll software providers within DORA’s scope? And if so, only if they provide services to Banks, Insurance companies, and Investment firms? Or as ICTs would they be subject to DORA independently of their customer?