Filter by
Search QAs ()
RSSOur question is related to validations EV74 and EV75 which have been recently modified (30th june 2026). If there is an asset with CIC code 87 or 88 and this asset doens't have an ISIN code, the field EC0231 should be blank or not?
Reading EV75 validation this field should be filled in in this spec…
In 2026/269 amending 2015/35 the following has been added on the definition of strategic investments:
"equity investments of a strategic nature shall mean equity investments to which the look-through approach does not apply"
What exactly does it mean that the look-through approach does not apply. …
In your published answer on the register of information, you clarified that in cases where no direct contract exists with the effective ICT third-party service provider, the financial entity should record the agreement with the reseller and complement it with any available information on the effecti…
Following the recent updates to the standard equity risk module, particularly paragraph 5 of article 169, please can you confirm the treatment of a long/short equity strategy where the short position does not qualify for risk mitigation.
Do we take the absolute value? e.g. 100 long + 100 Short…
Question 1:
May contractual performance consisting of granting of a licence for on-premise software, that is operated exclusively within the financial entity's infrastructure and without the ongoing provision of operational or other support activities by the supplier, be considered an ICT service w…
Article 10(2)(b) requires financial entities to perform automated vulnerability scanning and assessments at least weekly for ICT assets supporting critical or important functions.
Please clarify whether the weekly scanning and assessment requirement must be performed separately and independently …
We are writing to you in relation to the implementation of Threat-Led Penetration Testing (TLPT), as set out in Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 and its related delegated implementing regulations.
In this context, we would appreciate it if the EIOPA could clarify t…
The template S.23.02.01 is still listed as a Technical entry point in the Annotated Templates in the legacy format for the 2.10.0 taxonomy.
We believe this is an oversight as the template has been deleted.
Is it correct to state that the S.30.01 and S.30.02 are removed from the 2.10.0 taxonomy?
With the application of taxonomy S2 2.10.0 from 01/01/2027 reference date, a common conception was shared across several actors that annual reports for 31/12/2026, still under S2 2.8.2 HotFix, would allow exemption of reporting for templates deleted under the updated requirements. Namely S.21*, S.29…