Search QAs

Is the item C0200 from the S.14.04 QRT represented by the Technical Provisions that are released from the Beginning of period Technical Provisions due to lapse or surrender?

In QRT S.26.02 (Solvency Capital Requirement — Counterparty default risk), the application of simplifications is required to be reported in R0010/C0010. However, the following two simplifications are not part of the option list. If only these two simplification are applied in counterparty default risk calculation, how should the field R0010/C0010 be filled out? Should option "9 - Simplifications not used" be selected? - Simplification in Article 107 of DA 2015/35 (simplified calculation of risk mitigation effect of reinsurance arrangements) - Simplification in Article 112 of DA 2015/35 (simplified calculation of the risk adjusted value of collateral)

Question regarding the guidelines on reporting for financial stability purposes, template S.02.01.01: Frequency of statutory accounts. Could EIOPA confirm that the Column C0020 “Statutory accounts” in the Financial Stability reporting template S.02.01.01 shall be reported with an annually frequency (Q4 only) and not quarterly.

1. Cell C0190 is named "Cashed Premium - gross", but the description states "The gross cashed premiums represent the sum of the direct business and the accepted insurance business reduced by the amount ceded to reinsurance undertakings...", which would lead to net amounts instead of gross amounts. Could you please clarify if net or gross is meant here?

If there is a third country branch authorized in one of the EU member states, can that branch benefit from freedom of establishment and freedom of services in other EU member states?

Is it possible to explain the formula to determine the proportion? "2. Only risk-mitigation techniques that are in force for at least the next 12 months and which meet the qualitative criteria set out in this Section shall be fully taken into account in the Basic Solvency Capital Requirement.

Is there an error in Article 192(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 regarding the LGD formula for heavily collateralised reinsurers after amendments by Regulation (EU) 2019/708?

Could EIOPA confirm, flag it for correction, and inform supervisors to prevent undue disadvantage to undertakings? Article 112a may also need review.

Questions are regards S.17.03. We find some doubt about the rules for the country to be used for reinsurance accepted business. In the old E.03.01 template the rule was "information shall be reported by area or country in which the reinsured undertaking is resident". And in the life equivalent (S.12.02, which is in line with other QRTs where country breakdown is used e.g. S.04.05) there is similar guidance:

I have a question on the reporting of the issuer country (C0270) on the S.06.02 for CIC7s. In the instance of where a bank is registered in one country (E.g. US) but has a branch in another country (e.g. IE) and the cash/deposits are held in that branch, should the country be reported as that of the registered entity (US in above example) or the branch (IE in the above example)? Internally, we note the country of risk as being the country of the registered entity as opposed to the branch.