Question ID: 2805
Regulation Reference: (EU) 2023/894 - ITS with regard to the templates for the submission of information necessary for supervision
Topic: Validations
Article: N/A(Validation and Log inconsistency)(cell C0010/R026 & BV1156)
Template: S.01.02
Status: Final
Date of submission: 25 Sep 2023
Question
For the report S.01.02 cell C0010/R0260 we need to put the URL or “SFCR file provided” “SFCR file not provided” but in the validation rule BV1156 it check if it is an URL or (NOT PROVIDED/NOT AVAILABLE) There's an inconsistency, which one is the correct text for this cell in case we don't provide the URL?
Background of the question
the validation rule gives blocking error
EIOPA answer
EIOPA confirms the inconsistency. Both ‘SFCR file not provided’ and ‘SFCR file provided’ options will be added in the 2.8.0 Hotfix release. Furthermore, in order to accommodate the different Member States using different languages, EIOPA considers replacing the phrase with a language-agnostic solution - ‘0’. Therefore, until the revision of the ITS four options, alongside url, will be accepted:
- ‘NOT PROVIDED/NOT AVAILABLE’
- ‘SFCR file not provided’
- ‘SFCR file provided’
- ‘0’