Question ID: 1716
Regulation Reference: (EU) No 2015/35 - supplementing Dir 2009/138/EC - taking up & pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (SII)
Article: 189
Status: Final
Date of submission: 22 Nov 2018
Question
According to Article 189 relating to the capital requirement for counterparty default risk, Type 2 exposures include receivables from intermediaries.
Having reviewed the official Solvency II texts, along with available guidelines and EIOPA Q&As to date, it is not clear what the exact definition of an intermediary in this context is.
I expect that the definition of an intermediary would include insurance intermediaries, and for example a receivable would be commission clawback from brokers. Another example of a credit exposure which is not as straightforward to define in terms of the type of exposure, is when employers pay premiums on behalf of their employees (the policyholders), for example for short term medical insurance. Would the payment of such premiums by employers on behalf of an employee be more appropriately considered a Policyholder Debtor exposure (Article 189, Paragraph 3 (b))?
EIOPA answer
When determining the capital requirement for counterparty default risk on type 2 exposures, credit exposures resulting from an employer paying premiums on behalf of its employees (who are the policyholders) should not be included in the calculation of LGDreceivables>3months as defined in Article 202 even if payments have been due for more than three months.