Question ID: 495
Regulation Reference: (EU) No 2015/2450 - templates for the submission of information to the supervisory authorities
Article: 35
Status: Final
Date of submission: 05 Jan 2016
Question
Thank you very much for the published annotated templates version 2.0.1. They are very helpfull in the drawing up of requirements for our information systems. We are wondering however why they differ from the templates publishes as annexes to the Implementing Technical Standards.
Is this intentional, and if yes, can you please share the purpose of the difference.
If the difference is not intentional, can you please indicate which template will be adjusted and in what timeframe.
EIOPA answer
EIOPA confirms that line of identification was added to the annotated templates exclusively for technical reasons and it will not be introduced into the business templates.
It is true that line identification in the S.06.02.01 has a different code (C0010) then in the S.06.02.04 (C0400) and reason for that was because in the variant S.06.02.04 we already use code C0010 for the “Legal name of the undertaking”. At this moment we believe that it is better to keep it as it than to change codes.
These differences you are referring to are explained in taxonomy documentation and mainly are about artificial ID, joined cells for type of code and code, etc.