"Quantity" and "Par Amount" is to be reported on a position level whereas "Unit Solvency II price" and "Unit percentage of par amount Solvency II price" must be unique per investment.

For us the values  "Solveny II Amount", "Accrued Interest", "Quantity" and "Par Amount" are taken as delivered by our subsidiaries.

A unique price is not available why we decided to calculate it per Solo entity and investment and not according EIOPA´s definition.

Our approach leads to deviations with applied validation rules.

Shouldn´t it be possible that the price per position can differ?

In addition we would like use at least 6 decimal places for both price categories.

BV783: not({c0290} like '##71' or {c0290} like '##9#' or {c0290} like '##09')

if {c0130} <> empty then {c0170} = {c0130} * {c0370} + {c0180}

Message: The "Total Solvency II amount" is different from the product of "Quantity" and "Unit Solvency II price" plus "Accrued interest".

BV784: not({c0290} like '##71' or {c0290} like '##9#' or {c0290} like '##09')

if {c0140} <> empty then {c0170} = {c0140} * {c0380} + {c0180}

Message: The "Total Solvency II amount" is different from the product of "Par amount" and "Unit percentage of par amount Solvency II price" plus "Accrued interest".