Skip to main content
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority

1772

Q&A

Question ID: 1772

Regulation Reference: (EU) No 2015/2450 - templates for the submission of information to the supervisory authorities

Topic: Reporting Templates

Article: 35 of SII Directive

Template: S.06.02

Status: Final

Date of submission: 11 Apr 2019

Question

We do have question regarding to different QRT (S.06.02, S.06.03 and S.11.01)

Query 1) concerning S.06.02 (List of Assets):
The following applies to unit-linked life insurance policies: For unit linked life insurance policies a so called Dispositionsstock is reported in S.06.02 (List of Assets) with CIC 4 (fund). The “Dispositionsstock” can be reported with a negative value, because of the following reason:
The incoming premiums at the beginning of the current month for unit-linked life insurances are ordered on an estimation based on the previous month. Estimation mistakes will be eliminated with a second order for unit-linked life insurances in the first or second calendar week of the current month. Indeed the target and actual inventory of unit-linked life insurances should be zero, but the monthly closing is a few weeks later. Between the mentioned periods incoming cancellations will lead to a positive so called “Dispositionsstock”, new business lead to a negative “Dispositionsstock”.
In this case, the negative value is not accounted as a liability. The total sum of the funds for policyholders in the SII-balance-sheet is positive. The negative values do not turn in a liability position.
Therefore we kindly ask you to clarify the specific treatment for those assets. In our opinion other insurance companies have the same problem.

Query 2) concerning S.06.02 (List of Assets):
In another context the SII-Value and the Acquisition Value can also be negative without being a liability: If an insurance company invests in a newly launched private equity fund, but the feeder fund has not yet invested in various projects and initial-financing-dues have already been incurred (for example due diligence costs), the private equity fund has a negative market value. The negative Market Value is not accounted as a liability but as an asset, because valuation is expected to turn positive during the investment period. In this context, a negative SII Value is shown in the Asset QRT S.06.02 on the basis of a negative Market Value. For the same reasons, the Acquisition Value also can be negative.
Would you also clarify the specific treatment for this transaction too?

Query 3) relating to the queries above (I and II):
We kindly ask you to clarify how to handle the negative Values in QRT S.06.03. As we mentioned the negative Value is not a liability. Therefore, in our opinion it seems to be incorrect to report the negative SII Amount with category L-Liabilities in S.06.03.

Query 4) relating to QRT S.11.01 (Assets held as collateral):
We kindly ask you to clarify if a Cash Collateral position, which is shown in the IFRS-balance sheet and therefore reported in S.06.02 (with CIC 79) should also be reported in QRT S.11.01. The economic ownership belongs to the counterpart that is pledging the collateral, although it is accounted by the security holder. We are wondering how to handle such a position at the year-end reporting.

EIOPA answer

Prior information:
The so called "Dispositionsstock" is a specific legal term derivated from German national insurance law. Insurance undertakings estimate the demand for fund shares resulting out of their unit linked contracts in advance (on a monthly basis). It may occur that the demand is far greater than initially assumed leaving the previously bought portfolio insufficient to meet the existing demand. The "Dispositionsstock" will then be negative. However, the equivalent of premium income exists and will be used to stock up the missing stake balancing the "Dispositionsstock".

 Concrete answer:

Query 1): Under certain circumstances the „Dispositionsstock" can be negative. In those cases the "Dispositionsstock" leads to a negative amount (demand higher than the portfolio). The product of the negative amount and the positive unit price will in those circumstances lead to an overall negative Solvency II value. The negative S II-value does not turn into a liability position and shall not be disclosed as a liability position either, due to the fact that the total sum of the funds for policyholders in the SII-balance-sheet is always positive.

Query 2): This approach may not be the ideal solution, but it fully respects the guiding reporting and accounting principles. The approach is justifiable.

Query 3): Similar procedure as in Query 1 and 2. The position must be disclosed as negative figure but not as liability.

Query 4): "Cash Collateral" is used as "Cash Collateral received" ergo it is accounted in the balance sheet of the protection provider/protection seller. Therefore, it will not be reported in the balance sheet and S.06.02 of the protection buyer/collateral-taker. S.11.01 is disclosing the off-balance sheet collateral. S.06.02 C0100 is only used to disclose the assets the reporting undertakings has sold/used as collateral.

Disclaimer: The negative reported figures are in all four circumstances correct. However, we believe that some validation rules might be affected by the negative reporting figures.