Skip to main content
Logo
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
 

Search QAs

Filter by

Search QAs ()

RSS
Showing results 560 to 570

We've have been advised by one of our third-party vendors that the S.08.02 report is no longer in use and has been discontinued. Please confirm if this is correct.

Clarification is needed on whether the interest rate scenario should be selected based on the capital requirement for the interest rate risk sub-module for the interest rate sub-module, or on the overall capital requirement for the entire portfolio. For example:
Capital requirement for interest rate risk in the up scenario: 6
Capital requirement for interest rate risk in the down scenario: 5
Overall capital requirement if the up scenario is retained: 8
Overall capital requirement if the down scenario is retained: 9

1. Regarding the sum insured (i.e., SI(peril, r,i) in the formula of 6.5.3.3. EIOPA’s advice- 425 -1) 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑠(𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑙,𝑟,𝑖) = 𝑄(𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑙,𝑟) × 𝑊(𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑙,𝑟,𝑖) × 𝑆𝐼(𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑙,𝑟,𝑖),

1.1 Is it correct that the SI include buildings, business interruption and contents?

1.2 Is the sum insured (i.e., 𝑆𝐼(𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑙,𝑟,𝑖)) the full amount of SI without taking into account any deductibles or contractual limits? In other words, it is SI before any reductions are applied due to the terms of the policy.

1.3 If 1.2 is correct, should the 𝑆𝐼(𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑙,𝑟,𝑖)) in the formula 425 1)consider coinsurance shares?

Is it correct that the heading "Group solvency calculation" should be over all three columns C0260, C0270 and C0280 and not only over C0260 as in the current Excel annotated template S.32.01.04? The specifications to C0270 and C0280 are depicted in the ITS at least together with C0260 under the the heading "Group solvency calculation".

Regarding templates S.37.01 and S.37.02, we have a couple of questions relating to the reporting of insurance policies:

1. We wonder what a reporting group should do in the event that the group cannot easily produce the appropriate sector code relating to reported insurance policies (C0250) in S.37.01 and S.37.02. We can see that EIOPA has previously provided guidance in the case of insurance contracts attributable to natural persons, in which case "Other" may be applied when sector is to be assigned, compare the answer provided to earlier question # 2535. But our question is about the case where the correct sector code for a legal person (= a company) cannot not be found, what should then be done when reporting insurance policies in S.37.01 and S.37.02?

Regarding the data that should be reported in the QRT S.19 and based on the reading for the instructions for the item 'Gross Reported but not Settled Claims (RBNS) – Triangle' (C0400 to C0550/R0100 to R0250), could you please indicate which provisions should be taken into account?

If institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORP) only offer one pension scheme, does the disclosure on Principal Adverse Impacts at entity level trigger the application of Article 8 SFDR for the product as the product cannot easily be differentiated from the FMP?

A PEPP provider invests the assets corresponding to the PEPP in exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The ETF manager charges management fees for managing a particular ETF.
Should the ETF management fees be disclosed to PEPP saver? Should the ETF management fees be included in the total annual costs of the PEPP and subsequently published in PEPP KID? With reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation 2021/897, in which category of costs should it be reported to the National Competent Authority?

Does NÜRNBERGER life and pension insurance comply with Directive 2003/41/EC?

In Annex II of Regulation 2023/984 additional columns are introduced to QRT S.06.02. Especially columns "Code of custodian" (C0121) and "Type of code of custodian" (C0122). These columns seem to be merged into one column in template "EIOPA_SolvencyII_DPM_Annotated_Templates_2.8.0.xlsx" (i.e. sheet "S.06.02.01", column "Custodian code and Type of code"). All information concerning the metric of content given in the corresponding dictionary seem to consider a merged column, too.