Search QAs

I have a CIC code query with regads to all EDC (Export Development Canada) securities. Bloomberg reflects a CIC code of 21 but this issuer carries the full faith and credit of Canada and constitues direct and unconditional obligations of Canada.Can you please look into this and advise as we feel...

Let's consider exposures in the form of bonds and loans that are fully, unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by central governments and central banks that meet the conditions described in paragraph 3 of Article 180, an

In the new ITS 2023/894, Annex III, instructions for S.36.01, you have: NC0190 Amount of dividends/interest/coupon and other payments made during reporting period This cell shall capture any payments made in relation to the intragroup transaction s recorded in this template for the reporting period (6 months up to the reporting date)articl

Is a credit default swap considered a financial instrument

I understand that funds with no look-through are treated as type 2 equity when calculating their capital charges.

Regarding the "Identification code of the ICT third-party service provider’s ultimate parent undertaking" and the "Type of code to identify the ICT third-party service provider’s ultimate parent undertaking". I am having doubts regarding the concept of ultimate parent undertaking. My question is if, for the purpose of DORA,

An Insurance client has filed to discontinue operations in Europe and have stopped any new business. Their European exit is mid 2025. Would they need to comply with all parts of DORA or are there exemptions? Could they apply for an extension?

Is there a presumed timeline of the reissue of ITS regarding the standard template for the register of information referred to in article 28(3) DORA by the ESAs? Furthermore, is there a presumed timeline of adoption of the RTS on subcontracting ICT services supporting a critical or important function (legal basis being article 30(5) DORA)?

EV63_3 and EV63_4 seem to be improperly implemented. The rule EV92 states that the Investment Expenses should be equal or lower to the investment expenses reported in S.29.02 (C0010 / R0050). The investment expenses in S.29.02 are reported negative too comply with the calculations in force on the S.29 in general.