Search QAs

C0293 Bail-in rules: I am wondering if "yes" has to be reported for CIC 72/73/74, regardless of the amount of the bank deposit? Since only deposits above 100T€ are subject to bail-in requirements.

The log file referring to cell C0245 of QRT S.30.03 states that "in the case the treaty only includes one layer, this cell will be equal to C0250". But C0250 requires a number whereas C0245 requires an amount. How can they be equal (in case of one layer)?

The definition of cic classes 87 and 88 states that they shall prevail over cic classes 81 - 86. Does this also apply for Mortgages, loans made with collateral in the form of real estate to natural persons and loans made with insurance policies as collateral, or are these type of loans completely excluded from cic classes 87 and 88?

Thanks for the answer in Q&A #2662. We have a follow-up question. So we understand from Q&A 2662 answer that EIOPA are not prohibiting completion of C0130 for rows in S.14.02 that are not "products falling under line of business 1 and product categories 11.1 and 12.2 ". But what should a filer do for the total Line of business ("LoB") row for lines of business 11 and 12 where separate rows for product categories 11.1 and 12.2 have also been completed.

In general, the reporting instructions update coinciding with the 2.8 taxonomy clarify how to treat negative amounts within the materiality threshold calculations (e.g. S.02.02, S.12.02, S.17.03 etc.) and also where non-life and life business is present (e.g. S.30.01 through S.30.04). These cases are not specified though for S.31.01 and immaterial currencies apropos C0155. 1. Can EIOPA please confirm if any special treatment is required for negative reinsurance recoverables

In Q&A #2651 the question isn't answered or, at least, it is unclear what the significance of option 9 and empty being equivalent (" ..... form business perspective we can say it is equal,.... ") in business terms means for completing this datapoint for CIC other than 3 or 4 (although we accept the error regards option 9 vs empty in that question which confused things).

In S.37.01 there is a field other direct exposures. What is to be subsumed under this? Are other assets and liabilities to be entered there that do not fall into the specified categories?

Regards the changes to reporting the non-life geographical breakdown of gross BE and TPCAW in 2.8 taxonomy, and the pre-existing requirements (continued under 2.8 taxonomy) for life geographical breakdown of gross BE and TPCAW. Regards S.17.01 and S.17.03. Previously S.17.02 was direct only, now s.17.03 is direct plus reinsurance – so in general amounts should match (like they do for s.12.01 and S.12.02 and enforced via blocking validation BV835) There is such validations reconciling S.17.01 with S.17.03 (eg BV2010 for non-prop health) but these are Warning severity.

Regards the new S.04.05 template from 31.12.2023 reference date reporting. We are unsure whether amounts (the gross part therein, we are aware that these rows in S.05.01 are to be filled in on a net basis) in S.05.01 R1210 and R2510 ("Balance - other technical expenses/income") should be included with S.04.05 R0050 i.e. should gross technical expenses that are included in S.05.01 R1210 and R2510 be allocated to a line of business in S.04.05.