Search QAs

According to the FINAL REPORT: REVISED DRAFT ITS ON THE MAPPING OF ECAIS’ CREDIT ASSESSMENTS document the fitch short terming rating F1+ has can credit quality step of 1 and is therefore an equivalent of a AA long term rating. This means that an short term note of, for example, Germany/France/Netherlands a AA rating which is in our opinion quite low. Since the default of those country, especially on an short term is very unlikely? So the question is why does Eiopa consider F1+ as an AA equivalent instead of a AAA equivalent?

To the answer of Q&A No. 2802 arise two additional questions: • According to the LOG file item C0120 (“Amount of Claims Paid”) is defined as “Amount of claims paid, for the relevant product Identification, for claims that have been settled with payment during the reporting year.” This is not consistent to the answer of Q&A No. 2802.

Regarding these new fields what should we refer to: Log Eiopa or the validation rule provided in the xbrl?

New taxonomy 2.8.0 has introduced two new fields: C0010-C0100/R0120 and C0010-C0100/R0130 related to SCR and MCR ratios, but the formula requested by Log Eiopa states division operations while, for the other fields above in those columns,

Could you kindly provide clarification on the C0250 field labeled "Insurance Policies"? Specifically, I would like to understand whether this field pertains to insurance policies held by the company as a client, or if it refers to policies issued by the company. Any additional guidance or examples regarding the appropriate content for this field would be greatly appreciated.

This question is for QRT S25.05. I am not able to select this in the template drop down list. For QRT S25.05 it is unclear were to report (and there for include) LAC DT and LAC TP. Can EIOPA give instruction in what Row(s) LAC DT and LAC TP should be reported?

Would EIOPA consider the following to be within the definition of “cyber risks underwritten” as defined in the instructions for completing form S.14.03: a policy for which the primary cover is not cyber and cyber was not bought as a specific add-on, but for which there may be unintended exposure in the case of a cyber-related event.

The question relates to subordinated debt issued by a Turkish insurance company and being purchased by a Greek insurance company. The two entities belong in the same Group of companies (i.e. they have the same insurance parent company). How would the purchase of such a debt be recognized by the Greek insurance company?

Can you please clarify the instructions for item S.36.01/ NC0190? It is saying: "6 months up to the reporting date". In case the template is submitted on an annual basis (1.1.-31.12.), do we only have to report payments from 1.7. until 31.12.?

We're seeking clarification on the new S.04.03, S.04.04, and S.04.05 QRTs added to the 2.8 taxonomy. Our operations are solely within our home country (EEA), but we conduct direct business with one non-EEA country. Is it correct that in S.04.03, we only need to report using one underwriting entity code, selecting Head Office (C0020) and EEA Branch (C0030)? Additionally, in S.04.04.01.01, should we report "R0020-R0050" separately, with home country results in C0010 and non-EEA results in C0020? Furthermore, in S.04.04.01.02, are we only required to report the home country results? Lastly, is filing S.04.05 necessary for our situation?