Search QAs

Regarding the new S.06.04 QRT we kindly request your clarification on "Climate change-related physical risk - KPI" (R0020). There seems to be an inconsistency in the definition of the denominator between DPM Dictionary and ITS on supervisory reporting. The former (EIOPA_DPM_Dictionary_2.8.0.xlsx, Sheet PP, Name x80) states "Investments exposed to physical risk TO TOTAL OF INVESTMENTS ratio" while the latter ("ITS_reporting_AnnexII_solo instructions_S.01_to_S.13_reviewed 20220615.docx")

Q&A ID 1074 is still valid in the new taxonomy? There should be one row for each Product ID code in the old sections ("Characteristics of product" and "Portfolio") and in the new "Portfolio product" section

I am in the process of documenting the requirements for the new S.06.04 report. Is there any guidance as to how we can calculate the two values for our funds? For R0010 we have the value at risk in $mil for each underlying instrument in the fund For R0020, we have the Expected Direct Loss for each underlying instrument in the fund How do we do the roll up and calculation to get to the value for the fund for R0010 and R0020 for the S.06.04 report please or where we could find this?

In S.14.03 C0030 Product Identification the guidance says “One of the options in the following closed list shall be used: (1) First Party Loss (2) Third Party Loss (3) Costs and related services” But the guidance also says: “In principle, only one item can be chosen from the list to characterise the Product Identification; however, in exceptional cases and in case of reporting from Reinsurance undertakings, multiple selection is allowed.” Given this data point

Regarding Q&A 2553, the answer to the 3rd question is that UL and index linked investments are not in the scope of the KPI on transition risk.​ Can you confirm if UL and index linked investment are in the scope for physical risk?

Regards the new S.14.02 QRT for 2.8 and the associated LOG guidance (in the draft business package supporting SII taxonomy 2.8.0). Can EIOPA confirm if C0110 should be net of salvage and subrogation (unlike other places where claims paid is required, such as SE.17 ER0421 and ER0422).

The threshold for S.14.03 is cyber premium earned is greater than €5 million or greater than 5% of overall non-life business. Is that Gross or Net Premium Earned?

Regarding new field « C0142 » « Remaining contractual maturity » in S.14.01, we understand from « remaining maturity » that the calculation should be based on the average age at reporting date. Whereas the example provided let us think that the average age at underwriting date should be used. Could you please clarify which element (average age at reporting date or at underwriting date) should be considered?

According to Annex II Claims management expenses should include the movement in provisions in claims management expenses. IFRS17 does not recognize a provisions in claims management expenses on its own. Should in this case only the paid expenses be reported without any movement in provisions?