Search QAs

Can we ask EIOPA to reconsider/confirm their answer to 1732: "In S.12.01 it is expected that C150/R230 is equal to C150/R240 + C150/R250" as it seems to contradict the initial purpose of having the R0230 line available in the first place (and not just R0240 and R0250).Taking a company that only...

R0230 to R0280 of this QRT are used to provide the present value of guarnatees, future discretionary benefits, premiums, expense etc. Could you please confirm that R0230 + R0240 + R0250 +R0260 - R0270 - R0280 should agree to R0030 (i.e. it provides an analysis of Gross BEL) and not R0030 (Gross...

We would like to clarify the calculation of Linear MCR in QRT S.28.02, R300/C0130 which came up in Q&A Number 1653.Based on our understanding C0130/R0300 is not necessarily the sum of C0010/R0010 + C0010/R0020 + C0070/R0200 + C0080/R0200 since the linear MCR should be calculated based on the TPs...

What exactly is expected in QRT S.09.01 "rent" (C0090) - Should we show only the rent income earned or is it allowed to deduct administration costs.

We read EIOPA's answer to question #1368, where you stated that 1) a repurchase agreement should be reported in two lines with CIC corresponding to the lended asset and **7* for the cash received and 2) a reverse repo should be reported with CIC XT85 (collateralized loan). This is somehow...

There is a difference in the ITS description for S.13 “Future Benefits” and S.12 R0230 “Future guaranteed and discretionary benefits”. Differences in ITS descriptions do not exist for any other cashflow type, ie. Future expenses and other cash out-flows, Future premiums, Other cash in-flows.For...

The description is: The ratio of insured persons with clinical symptoms utilising healthcare type, for each of the countries identified.Is there for the ratio a formula for calculation?And how must it be visible on the reporting.

I have a question on this explanatory note. The paragraph 1.15 page 4 don't match withe the paragraph 1.33 page 11.Since in paragraph 4 the own share are excluded with S.29.01.R0190 equal to sum of S.29.02.R0010, S.29.02.R0030, S.29.02.R0040 minus S.29.02.R0050 while in the other paragraph it...

If option 0 (Not reported other reason (in this case special justification is needed)) is chosen in S.01.01 for S.28.01, then BV333 fails (assuming use of standard formula). This seems like an error?Similar issue applies to BV334, BV335 and BV336.