Search QAs

For specialized reinsurers, what granularity the Product IDs are expected to be defined? Right at this moment, we are defining it based on Line of busienss level, a little bit more granular than SII LoBs.

Log states:"Only applicable to CIC categories 1, 2, 5 and 6."Under some circumstances, there is a possibility I will assign CQS also to CIC73 or CIC74.Does this mean that even if I use CQS for a CIC73 for the purposes of SCR calculation, I should not fill this value to C0340?

According to the instructions of Annex 3 - S.06.02 – List of assets (reported below), we shall add the ISO 4217 alphabetic code of the currency to the Asset ID code only in cases of assets issued in two or more different currencies.However, the document seems not specifying how to populate the...

Within QRT S.30.01, the field C0020 reinsurance programme code resulta as mandatory information and shall be always filled-in.The field allows to link reinsured risk (in facultative cover) with possible contractual reinsurance cession.In case mentiones risk is not reinsured how this field shall be...

Could you please specify what undertaking should put on the cell C0150 if it not applicable for product?

Should single name exposures with probability of default = 0% be included in this template?

Par amount (C0100). Per the log, it asks to disclose the par amount of the collateral. For a covered bond or structured product that is backed by mortgage and loans, should the value of the collaterals be the entire mortgage/loan pool.The reason being that different structured products will have...

Though C0050 is called number of contracts, it is expected to count the numbers of riders if one Product ID is representing the rider, right?For group contracts, it is expected to count also the contracts, but not the number of employees covered, right?

If company has no hedging program itself, but reinsured the guarantee part. How would that information be reflected?In this case, there is no "economic result with hedging", is that fine?