Filter by
Search QAs ()
RSSIt was found that the changes in NACE codes (Rev 2.1) which is said to take effect from 1st January 2025, was not adopted in Solvency II taxonomy 2.8.2. When is it planned to be adopted by EIOPA?
- Topics:
- Reporting Templates
Further clarification is needed on the business validation 1597, introduced with Taxonomy 2.8.0. BV1597 expresses the following: In S.23.02, R0100/C0010 (Total ordinary share capital) = R0010/C0010 (Paid in ordinary share capital) + R0020/C0010 (Called up but not yet paid in ordinary share capital)+ R0030/C0010 (Own shares held) However, according to the instruction, in S.23.02 R0010 should be represented gross of own shares. This validation rule would therefore imply a double count of own shares in R0100. Further, EIOPA indicated in Q&A 777 that “The information on own shares is not considered in the Total as it is already included in the amount of paid in share capital.
- Topics:
- Reporting Templates
- Validations
Regarding Control TV1002_1: New mandatory validation. The control compares fields C0131 (nominal) with field C0370 (currency). As the check is made between an amount and a text string, we do not understand what causes the validation error The validation at Eiopa looks as follows: localName(unit({t: S.08.01.01.01, c: C0131, z: Z0001})) = localName({t: S.08.01.01.02, c: C0370, z: Z0001})
- Topics:
- Validations
S.04.04.01.01 is reported by underwriting entity as specified in S.04.03. Validation rules between S.04.04.01.01 and S.05.01.01.01 is not able to capture the input reported for other underwriting entities than the head office in validation. Example BV1875; “Fire and other damage to property insurance"" reported in template S.04.04 - Activity by country - location of underwriting should be equal to the total GWP written in the S.05.01 - Premiums, claims and expenses by line of business for
- Topics:
- Reporting Templates
- Validations
The assertion s2md_BV1015-5 seems incorrect, it checks The item "Maturity date" in S.06.02 - List of assets should not be reported for assets with CIC codes different from CIC '##1#', '##2#', '##5#', '##6#', '##74', '##79' or '##8#'.but in the rule we have filter : <gFilter test="matches(.,"^..((1.)|(2.)|(5.)|(6.)|(74)|(79)|(8.))$")" cover="true" complement="true" />it should be not match as in 2.7 as this : <gFilter test="not(matches(. ,"^..((1.)|(2.)|(5.)|(6.)|(74)|(79)|(8.))$"))" />
- Topics:
- Validations
The following issue refers to Rule BV396. First of all we wonder why this rule applies for the Annual SII report but not for the quarterly submission as at Q4? The other question is contentwise: The formula refers to the balance sheet position "Amounts due in respect of own fund items or initial fund called up but not yet paid in". According to our understanding this amount that has not yet been paid in could refer to any kind of own fund item in the S.23. sheet. Under this assumption it is not clear to us why this position is only aligned with the positions "Ordinary share capital"
- Topics:
- Validations
In 2025 the NACE nomenclature will change. When must it be taken into account in order to complete the Solvency II templates?
- Topics:
- Reporting Templates
The NACE 2 Rev 1 reorganization is scheduled to come into force in 2025. To what extent does EIOPA expect the use of the new NACE codes in the Tri Partie Template (TPT FinDatEx) or in the corresponding S.06.02/S.06.03 templates? Do the new NACE codes have to be used as of March 31, 2025? Does there have to be a double report with old and new NACE codes?
- Topics:
- Reporting Templates
Financial entities shall keep readily accessible records of activities before and during disruption events when their ICT business continuity plans and ICT response and recovery plans are activated. Is the phrase "when their ICT business continuity plans and ICT response and recovery plans are activated" is to be understood as a condition? When does "before" start?
1. What are the DORA Objectives directly applicable to CTPP. 2. Which type of CTPP are impacted by DORA. 3. How the audit process would look like. 4. What are the steps in the audit for CTPP. 5. Who would be the auditors assessing the requirements for CTPP. 6. What kind of evidence are required to prove conformance with the CTPP requirements. 7. How scoping will be performed for CTPP, what could be the boundaries.
- Topics:
- ICT third-party risk management (DORA)