We would like to ask for some clarifications about the compilation of the new QRT S.14.03 on cyber underwriting risk that will be introduced by the Taxonomy 2.8.0. The new QRT will require to distinguish the “Product Identification” (C0030) (i.e. first party loss, third party loss and related costs and services) and report for each type of product the “Sum(s) Insured” (C0080). Our doubt is relative to the case where the contract includes: (i) multiple guarantees (i.e. first party loss, third party loss and related costs and services) under a single policy, with each guarantee associated with a maximum coverage limit, and (ii) an overall coverage limit that is lower than the sum of the individual limits associated with each guarantee. In this situation the overall exposure of the company to cyber underwriting risk cannot be calculated as the sum of the “Sum(s) Insured” (C0080) for each “Product Identification” (C0030), as the it would return an outstanding amount substantially higher than the real exposure. This would result in a reporting that is not fit for supervisory purposes. In this regard, we would like to ask if you can please provide more information on how to report the “Sum(s) Insured” (C0080) for contracts that include multiple guarantees and an overall coverage limit.