Search QAs

In S.14.02 C0140 Number of insured properties at the end of the year: for products under the line of business 4 and 5 – this would mean for us motor vehicle liability insurance and other motor insurance. However, for motor “insured properties” does not make sense. Is this “insured vehicles” or are maybe the numbers 4 and 5 wrong? “Insured properties” would make sense for fire and other damage to property insurance?

In relation to the population of the new template S.14.02, it would suggest from Q&A#2668, that a 'Total/NA' subcategory is required to be reported for each LoB in addition to any relevant sub-category. This could result in multiple rows being reported for a single LoB. The ‘Total/NA’ product category should represent the total for that LoB,

We have some insurance contracts with line of business 7 - fire and other property insurance, which covers basic risks, but also natural hazards, i.e. one part would have to be shown under 7 and the other part under 7.1. We can separate this for the written premium, but how should the fields number of contracts (C0050) and number of new contracts (C0060) be filled. Should we record a 1 for both 7 and 7.1 for such a contract or only 1 for the more expensive risk?

I am looking for some clarity on the relationship between S.05.01 and S.26.06.

Specifically should all the below equations hold? (S.26.06.01.01 C0020 R0200) = (S.05.01.01.02 C0300 R1510) - (S.05.01.01.02 C0230 R1510) , (S.26.06.01.01 C0020 R0230) = PREVIOUS YEAR((S.05.01.01.02 C0300 R1510) - (S.05.01.01.02 C0230 R1510)), (S.26.06.01.01 C0020 R0220) = (S.05.01.01.01 C0300 R0210) + (S.05.01.01.01 C0300 R0220) + (S.05.01.01.01 C0300 R0230) , (S.26.06.01.01 C0020 R0250) = PREVIOUS YEAR((S.05.01.01.01 C0300 R0210) + (S.05.01.01.01 C0300 R0220) + (S.05.01.01.01 C0300 R0230)), (S.26.06.01.01 C0020 R0330) = (S.05.01.01.02 C0230 R1900)

What is expected to be reported in C0300/R2600 Total technical expenses? (Observe that the row is called differently - C0300/R2600 Total expenses in ITS.) Many reporting entities are interpreting it as a sum of all net expenses and Balance - other technical expenses/income (C0300/R2510). Does this row have any sense, and if yes what should it show?

Regards the new datapoints added to S.14.01 in 2.8 taxonomy, and the associated LOG guidance (in the draft business package supporting SII taxonomy 2.8.0). Can EIOPA please advise if the following relationships are expected to always hold. For the same row in S.14.01: 1. C0260, C0261 and C0280 must either all be empty or must all be non-empty

I am writing a thesis on Captive domicile trend in Europe. I kindly ask you if it possible to receive papers in this respect and interview any EIOPA shareholder who is dealing with this matter.

We would like to have some clarification regarding the following templates:

Question 1:

S.14.03: Regards the new S.14.03 QRT, for the expected scope, does the QRT concerns all contracts that were in the portfolio for at least one day during the year under review or just the contracts in force at the end of the year?

In the ITS 2023/894 the CIC code no. 87 („Loans to AMSB members“) was added in Annex VI. The definition says: „Loans made to AMSB members. This class shall prevail over the ones above“. Does the definition refer only to the current members of the AMSB or does it refer to the former members of the AMSB as well?