Search QAs

The following issue refers to Rule BV396. First of all we wonder why this rule applies for the Annual SII report but not for the quarterly submission as at Q4? The other question is contentwise: The formula refers to the balance sheet position "Amounts due in respect of own fund items or initial fund called up but not yet paid in". According to our understanding this amount that has not yet been paid in could refer to any kind of own fund item in the S.23. sheet. Under this assumption it is not clear to us why this position is only aligned with the positions "Ordinary share capital"

In 2025 the NACE nomenclature will change. When must it be taken into account in order to complete the Solvency II templates?

The NACE 2 Rev 1 reorganization is scheduled to come into force in 2025. To what extent does EIOPA expect the use of the new NACE codes in the Tri Partie Template (TPT FinDatEx) or in the corresponding S.06.02/S.06.03 templates? Do the new NACE codes have to be used as of March 31, 2025? Does there have to be a double report with old and new NACE codes?

Financial entities shall keep readily accessible records of activities before and during disruption events when their ICT business continuity plans and ICT response and recovery plans are activated. Is the phrase "when their ICT business continuity plans and ICT response and recovery plans are activated" is to be understood as a condition? When does "before" start?

1. What are the DORA Objectives directly applicable to CTPP. 2. Which type of CTPP are impacted by DORA. 3. How the audit process would look like. 4. What are the steps in the audit for CTPP. 5. Who would be the auditors assessing the requirements for CTPP. 6. What kind of evidence are required to prove conformance with the CTPP requirements. 7. How scoping will be performed for CTPP, what could be the boundaries.

Which public authorities are responsible for producing the mentioned standard contractual clauses? In the case that it is not the ESAs or individual Lead Overseer, are the Joint Committee/ the individual ESAs going to publish guidelines on what these standard clauses should entail (stretching further than the minimum standards set in Art. 30 section 2 and 3.)?

In what circumstances are service providers which are financial entities to be considered as ICT third-party service providers and included in the Register of Information?

I couldn't find any information about - joint report assessing the feasibility of further centralisation of incident reporting through the establishment of a single EU Hub for major ICT-related incident reporting by financial entities. The joint report shall explore ways to facilitate the flow of ICT- related incident reporting, reduce associated costs and underpin thematic analyses with a view to enhancing supervisory convergence.

In FC 06 and FC 07 the total amount of the risk position in the insurance policies (limit of liability or sum insured, depending on which amount corresponds to the maximu possible risk exposure) has to be stated in item FC 180 Insurance policies. The sum insured merely represents a contractually agreed upper limit and, like the nominal value of a derivative, has little to do with the actual risk exposure. In addition, the allocation to the contractual partner is not appropriate