Search QAs

According to your answer on question 3196, we need to determine if we should use the national or international rating scale for our bank deposits in the local currency. I cite relevant parts from the definitions below: International Credit Ratings: - "International credit ratings relate to either foreign currency or local currency commitments and, in both cases, assess the capacity to meet these commitments using a globally applicable scale",

Is EIOPA responsible for debt collection agencies and their practices? If yes, how so? If not, do you know if there is an EU agency and/or EU legislation regarding the matter?

Please provide us the list options for cell C0010/R0090 on table PFE.01.02.30.01 for Hotfix 2.9.0.

Deposits to cedants (CIC 75) are reported on a single line in template SE.06.02. Do deposits to cedants have to be detailed in template E.01.01, or do they have to be reported globally, as on report SE.06.02, on a single line?

Can you please provide clarification as to why only NACE sections A to N, as prescribed in S.06.02 have been identified as needing to be reported in S.06.04 R0010. Are there any specific reference to a regulation which identifies a need to exclude sectors O- T

Are commission claw-backs part of C0071 (Total amount of commissions paid during year) or not?

We are struggling with a clear assignment of some assets to CIC codes, in particular 22/25/28/51. Could you please confirm that our understanding of the following instruments is correct?

One of our insurance entities was contacted by their local authority regarding Q4_2024 reporting. They asked them to fill column “C0145 Long-term equity investment” in the list of assets (S.06.02) also for assets without CIC 3 or 4. They demand that for all other CIC the element “9 – not applicable” must be filled in. Together with our system provider we analyzed this topic and found the following instructions. From the LOG File, we think it is clear that the column only has to be filled for CIC 3 and 4. But the EIOPA Q&A lead to some confusions. Reading the Q&A 2651, EIOPA confirms that there are 4 available options.

In Q&A 2553 and 2729 you confirm the S.06.04 is RECOMMENDED to look through,e.g. based on the S.06.03. But this are only assets classes and doesn't mean anything about climate risk. The same for the NACE-codes in the S.06.02. You also answer that "for this, undertakings are allowed to make their own estimates". By doing so their is no force for the sector for one (comparable) standard.